Monday, December 17, 2012

12.4.12 Class Notes


We began with a Placemat Activity: For the first step in this strategy, we watched a portion of the youtube video of Michio Kaku discussing string theory & the way physics have improved our daily lives.  We were broken into groups of 4 and given a large sheet of paper.  Each of us wrote a reflection in a corner of the sheet.  We then each read our groups responses and came up with a synthesis that we wrote on the center of the sheet.  We all agreed this was a useful tool.



We then discussed intervention services for students with difficulty reading/ writing.  The success and failures of reading intervention in the middle grades was presented.  Most intervention done in early education has greater success.  Allington talked about high quality instruction all day & quality of teachers as key factors to reading competency.  He believed that reading time correlates with reading success. Also stated that students need books they can read and are interested in as decoding instruction not useful for older, struggling readers.

Finally we talked about Study Skills: Strategies, modeling, think alouds, etc. 
Teachers make false assumptions about students ability to study.  Subject specific organizers & guides good tools for students to try.   Forced memory has been replaced by the cognitive view.  What tools do we have to not only help students remember, but process info?  Active learners have more success remembering information.  Multi-tasking not effective & there is no one right strategy for all students.  Goal is to support students through the whole process of studying...integrate info, select right info, remember, retrieve and rehearse (highlight, note take, outline), write, respond, summarize, transform, organize (relate to what you know). 


 

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Class Meeting November 13th


Class Meeting November 13th
Jon McCall

Our lesson today focused on teaching writing strategies. We learned about and practiced several different techniques for getting our students to write in fun, engaging, and valuable ways.

1. We began the lesson with a warm-up activity called “Tea Party.” This activity is designed to introduce students to the characters of a book prior to reading it. In this activity each student is assigned a character and does a brief reading about their whoever they have been assigned. After this, students circulate the room interviewing each other and recording information about each character. By doing this the hope is that students will be more familiar with the characters of a story before they begin reading. This way children can better understand readings and focus their thoughts on the plot of the story and higher-level ideas in the text.

2. After this we reviewed the answers to the online quiz that all of us took on our week off, clarifying answers that students struggled on.

3. We also talked about the two upcoming assignments due the next week

I-Search Paper
·      2-3 pages
·      Personal narrative describing your research process
·      Research a topic that you are teaching in your class or something else
·      Format
o   Identify topic
o   Come up with questions
o   How you addressed questions
o   What you learned
FAQ Paper
·      Construct a series of Frequently Asked Questions and their answers on a topic you are covering in your class
·      Format
o   Title
o   Intro paragraph
o   5 higher level questions about the topic
o   Use hyperlinks to essays answering each question
·      The hardest part about this is that you have to create hyperlinks that link the question to the answer.

How do you create hyperlinks? Watch this video!

 















4. Teaching writing
We discussed the idea that although it has been used in teaching for generations, data suggests that grammar instruction does not actually improve students’ writing.
5. Slideshow: a meta-analysis of educational research found writing instruction techniques that had statistical evidence of success included
·      Teaching students to summarize
·      Collaborative writing
·      Specific product goals
·      Word processing
·      Sentence combining – model putting two short sentences together
·      Pre-writing
·      Inquiry activities – engaging students in analyzing data
·      Process writing
·      Using models (mentor texts)

6. We viewed a lesson by two students on literal and inferential reading of poetry that used group reading strategies and collages to think about a poem. The lesson focused on the poem "I know why the caged bird sings" by Maya Angelou:




7. Slideshow: We saw another slideshow describing why it is that teaching grammar does not work.
·      Teaching grammar DOES NOT WORK!
·      Errors happen for a reason
·      We should see these errors as teachable moments and talk about them

8. RAFT activity – we used a writing technique called RAFT, in which students decide how they will write by first determining the Role, Audience, Form, and Topic of their writing piece. This technique could be used to have students a) engage in writing, and b) write from multiple perspectives about an issue.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Class Meeting 11/27/12


Warm Up Activity:
It was a small class.  The count came to a grand total of 4 students and one teacher. We began with an exercise in writing found poetry.  We watched a dramatic video about female ants hunting for prey and read an article critiquing the video.  Using only words from the article, we split into groups and rearranged paragraphs into stanzas in order to create poetry.  The masterpiece created by me and Lital follows:

A raiding column of female ants is on the hunt
For prey
            prey
                        pray .
Ants stream across the screen
Trouble is on many
                        many
many feet. 
These are predatory ants
                        predatory ants.
            One thousand termites are dead,
                        They promise same day service. 

This warm up activity illustrated the importance of flexibility in literacy education.   In any classroom, it is important to remember that are multiple ways to represent and interpret a given piece of information.  So often we assume that there are “right” and “wrong” answers, but with this activity, we see that there can be many different “rights”.  Just as the sentiment of the ants’ hunt could be accurately portrayed through video, prose, or poetry, so learning can be explored through multiple avenues.

Strategy 1: Breaking up the Lecture:
We watched the following video about spacing in a science curriculum and were given the instructions to record a question after the first minute and a half and then another question after the second minute and a half.


While we had a lively discussion about the pros and cons of spacing information in terms of reaching deeper levels of understanding and making learning accessible for the greatest number of students, we could all agree on the importance of breaking up a lecture and giving students goals or tasks during long periods of listening.  With this activity, we were asked to record questions at various points in order to ensure that we were paying attention and engaging with the video.  In our own classrooms, we must have students create or respond to questions, do practice problems, engage in discussion, or any other activity throughout the lecture to ensure that our students are engaging in active listening strategies for maximum retention of material.  

Strategy 2: Question, answer, relationships
For this activity, we were instructed to watch the following video with a mind that we would be creating various levels of questions afterwards.  The questions were to follow the format: right there, think and search, author and me, and on my own.  Each level of question required an increasing amount of thought and individual thought.



Lital’s and my questions follow:
Right there: Why is it problematic to assume that all swans are white if you observe 100 white swans in a row?
Think and search: How does observation play into scientific theory in various philosophies?
Author and me: From the video, what are three different ways to handle a theory that is disproven.  Which do you think makes the most sense and why?
On my own: Do you believe in supernatural events? How might your beliefs be challenged based on these theories seen in this video and how would you react to these challenges?

By identifying the depth of a question, students will have to engage in a more reflective practice of learning.  Instead of simply answering questions, students will have to think about where the source of information comes from to answer those questions.  They will have to think about the difference between opinion and fact and discern which would be most appropriate in a given situation.  This relates directly to the common core goal of identifying and defending a claim; students must think about why they think the way that they think and how they can articulate that to the world.  By making students into metacognitive and deliberate learners, we can teach them skills that will have relevance long after they leave our classrooms.